Written by Dr. Firpo W. Carr, (Columnist), on 11-13-2008 00:00
Favoured
18
Yin and yang just got a new twist. The ebb and flow of reality just crossed over into a parallel universe. Talk about mixed race and mixed ancestry! If ever the saying was true that you can’t choose your relatives, it is most assuredly true in the case of former presidential hopeful, Senator John McCain. While everyone on the planet knows that President-elect Obama has White relatives, few are aware of McCain’s Black ones. That’s right. If McCain had been elected president, there would’ve been a bunch of Black people running around bragging that their cousin’s the President of the United States. “Some of McCain’s black family members say they are not sure exactly where they fall on the family tree,” says the South Florida Times, “but they do know this: They are either descendants of the McCain family slaves, or of children the McCains fathered with their slaves.” This revelation has to rank up there with Black Democratic President-elect Barack Obama and White current Republican Vice President Dick Cheney being distant cousins!
Research shows that William Alexander McCain, Senator John McCain’s slave-owning ancestor who fought and died for the Confederacy in the Civil War, acquired 52 slaves according to official records. Sexual commingling gave birth to several generations of Black and biracial McCains. The above article divulges that during his bid for the presidency, “The McCain campaign did not respond to repeated questions about John McCain’s black relatives.” The article goes on to disclose that “the senator has numerous black and mixed-raced relatives who were born on, or in, the area of the McCain plantation. The mixed races in the family can be traced back to the rural Teoc community of Carroll County, Miss., where his family owned slaves.” As America defines it, anyone of ‘mixed race’ ancestry with Black blood coursing through his or her veins is considered Black--as if blood from melanin-enriched People of Color is somehow contaminated. Consider this:
Blacks are the only ones fractionalized in the dictionary. For instance, “mulatto” means half Black and half White. It comes from the Spanish or Portuguese word mulo, meaning “mule,” and is defined in Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary as “the first-generation offspring of a Negro and a white; a person of mixed Caucasian and Negro ancestry.” The thought is that whenever Black blood is mixed with White blood, the result is an animal. Half of a half is a quarter. So, if you have one quarter of Black blood in you, then you’re a quadroon, “a person of one-quarter Negro ancestry.” Of course, half of a quarter is an eighth, hence, octoroon: “a person of one-eighth Negro ancestry.” Please note, neither a quadroon nor an octoroon is defined in the dictionary as three-quarters White or seven-eighths White respectively. The strategy is to keep track of the Black blood in you.
Worthy of note is a Newsweek article dated February 13, 1995, that dealt with the fractionalization of African American blood. The article states, rather frankly, that “In America still one drop of Black blood is enough to change one’s complexion....As F. James Davis, a sociologist and author of Who Is Black? observed, other racial minorities...can be absorbed if they become one-fourth or less of that ancestry. But because people are so accustomed to classifying anyone with any African heritage as Black, he says, most Americans don’t even think to view blacks the same way as other immigrant groups...In Virginia during the 1800s, someone with less than one-fourth Negro blood could be white. In 1910, the state codified what had already become custom: white was defined as having less than one-sixteenth Negro ancestry. By 1924, urged on by white supremacists, legislators prohibited whites from marrying anyone with ‘a single drop of Negro blood.’ Other states, in the North as well as in the South, adopted a similarly restrictive view.”
Taxonomically speaking, scientists tell us that we’re all one human family and that racial features are superficial. They say that race itself, as customarily defined, is in fact artificial. These realities notwithstanding, sociologically speaking, our European-based society has imposed its will on the masses and has left an indelible imprint on the collective American psyche. To hell with science. When Tiger Woods was coming into his own back in 1997, Fuzzy Zoeller, described by CNN as “one of golf’s most colorful characters,” said: “Thatlittle boy [reminiscent of McCain referring to Obama as “that one” during their second debate] is driving well and he’s putting well. He’s doing everything it takes to win. So, you know what you guys do when he gets in here? You pat him on the back and say congratulations and enjoy it and tell him not to serve fried chicken next year. Got it?” (My emphasis.) True to the aforementioned fractional breakdown, despite Tiger being “mixed race,” Zoeller didn’t say, “tell him not to serve fish heads and rice” as a derogatory reference to his Asian side. No, he went for the Black blood meandering through Tiger’s veins.
Some would argue that Tiger himself is in denial when it comes to his own racial heritage. Though his father’s Black (his mother’s Asian), he apparently doesn’t completely embrace his father’s ancestry, or even acknowledge the African blood in other “biracial” or “mixed-race” individuals. When commenting on Obama’s election earlier this week on CNBC he described Obama as “multiracial,” and said that he was “lucky enough to see a person of color in the White House.” Even though Obama unhesitatingly identifies himself as Black, and even though his father is a Kenyan--straight out of Africa--some would characterize Tiger as dancing around the expressions “African American” or “Black” when referring to the President-elect like he’s avoiding sand traps or ponds on the golf course. And speaking of athletes, in an interview with HBO’s Real Sports last summer former Yankees outfielder Gary Sheffield accused manager Joe Torre of having given White players “preferential treatment during his time in New York and said that biracial shortstop Derek Jeter wasn’t ‘all the way black.’” For a certainty, the mores of the dominant society has its impact. One wonders how Halle Berry, Mariah Carey, or other “biracial” brothers and sisters would weigh in on the matter. But McCain’s relatives, Black and White, have not left us guessing.
“Lillie McCain, 56, another distant cousin of John McCain who is black,” reports the Florida article, “said the Republican presidential nominee is trying to hide his past, and refuses to accept the family’s history.” The professor of psychology went on to say: “I am absolutely supporting Obama, and it’s not because he’s black. It’s because he is the best person at this time in our history.” Several of McCain’s White relatives also voted for Obama. A colleague said jokingly to me: “Don’t you just hate it when both your Black and White relatives vote for a Black man far president? I hate when that happens.” To be sure, the face of race is changing in America. It remains to be seen, however, if the change is for the better. Ultimately, it will be. Count on it. Amen.
Word for the Week (or is it “Weak”): taxonomy: “the study of the general principles of scientific classification.”
Whites cannot reproduce anything but themselves! Through powerful propaganda and indoctrination we have been completely oblivious to what having white skin really means. We have been skillfully mislead to believe that white skin is mankind’s anthropological model and should be coveted. However, recent research paints a picture of white skin that is just the antithesis of what we have been brainwashed to believe. The polar bear analysis that was done by the Discovery Channel helps prove my point. If you shave the hair off a polar bear, the skin beneath is black. In nature the skin of the polar bear is black to absorb as much heat and light as possible to keep the arctic animal warm in its environment. It is also true for the Eskimo (Inuit). Human adaptation remains an insufficiently studied part of climate and climate change. Scientists have tried for years to prove that the environment was responsible for altering heredity.
Eskimos have brown skin. Eskimos have broad, flat noses. Africans have brown skin. Africans have broad, flat noses. Scientific studies have reported that people are dark because they live near the equator—not because they are Negroid or have a Negroid admixture. There are repeated arguments made by anthropologists when referring to Arabs being brown in color because of the equalitarian closeness. So what about the brownness of skin that occurs in mankind who live the furthest from the equator—the Artic? Also, the Eskimos’ nose shape does not work to explain temperature-dependencies. Broad, flat noses are more beneficial in hot environments—Oh really!
(See Part 2 bleow.)
Posted by Reader X (Part 2), on 11-16-2008 19:56,
Scientifically speaking, Black objects absorb heat very well and also emit heat very well. If heat wasn’t emitted at the same rate as was is absorbed, the black object would just get hotter and hotter until it melted. A black beaker cools down much faster than a shiny beaker that does not absorb or emit heat well at all. That is why snow does not melt in cold weather even when the sun is falling directly on it. All of the incident light energy is reflected away and none (or very little) is absorbed.
If black absorbs heat and light and white reflects it, how can we say that white people are adapted more to cold environments than warm? That insinuation that white skin is a result of environmental adaptation is the same orthodox dogma that we have been spoon fed for generations, however when subjected to scientific scrutiny it doesn’t hold water. Reports FALSELY SUGGESTED that Senegalese troops during World War I and Ethiopian troops during the Korean War showed higher rates of frostbite and frozen feet in the African soldiers than their European counterparts. The laboratory work of the researchers also suggested that black skin tissue was more prone to cold injury; however white skin also exhibited some damage. After further research the following was indicated: It was SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that samples of black skin tissue were less vulnerable to cold damage than the lighter European tissue. This does not sound indicative of white skin being more suitable to cold climates.
Caucasians have a higher concentration of enzyme inhibitors that suppress melanin production, according to Halprin & Ohkawara, 1966. White people also have calcified pineal glands.
Posted by Reader X (Part 3), on 11-16-2008 20:01,
You may ask how does this imply that white skin is a genetic defect, The pineal gland secretes melatonin, which activates the pituitary to release M.S.H. (Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone). It is in the melanocytes that melanin (Greek “melas”=black) is produced. Melanin is somewhat analogous to chlorophyll in plants. What a lot of people don’t realize is that melatonin is also related to fertility. Those with pigmented skin have the highest counts of melanocytes in the genitalia and nipples. The pigmentation in these areas can be influenced by sex hormones like estrogens and androgens. During pregnancy, the nipples, face, and abdominal wall become darkened. These areas of increased pigmentation during pregnancy are due to the increase in the production of estrogens.
Anthropologists try to account for the fact that the genitalia are darker by suggesting that protection is needed against ultraviolet radiation damage, and has been thus evolved through natural selection. This means that protection of the genitalia against forces that may prevent reproduction was needed. Similarly, in this view, the pigmentation of the nipples during pregnancy would be a defense against ultraviolet radiation damage to the nipples. Supposedly, this type of protection would be needed while breast-feeding during the early evolution of humans in Africa. According to Robins, 1991, darker pigmentation found in the genitals, may have evolved for the “protection of reproductive capacity”, in that the pigmentation protects gametes within the genitalia from ultraviolet radiation damage. This is a direct result of why white people have the lowest birthrates of all people on the planet and are going extinct. Their melanin deficiency is why their reproduction system does not work as efficiently as it should.
Posted by Reader X (Part 4), on 11-16-2008 20:06,
Whites attribute their failure of reproduction to behavioral or societal reasons. However, the reason is more a biological one. Melanin is present at the inception of life: A Melanin sheath covers both the sperm and the egg! In the human embryo, the melanocytes (skin pigment cells), brain and nerve cells all originate from the same place; the neural crest. Melanocytes resemble nerve cells and are essential for conveying energy. When Melanin is missing or insufficient in the ectoderm of the early embryo (blastula), this causes the mother to lose her baby; in the case of whites, a defective baby is produced, and over time, through inbreeding, wears down the already pathetically low levels of melanin. Reproduction stops altogether and virtual infertility is the end result.
As far as vitamin D metabolization, white people have the lowest bone density of all people on the planet. The skin is supposed to convert sunlight to Vitamin D because of 7-Dehydrocholesterol. However, white people reflect the sunlight so that the body compensates by depleting calcium from their bones. It makes whites more susceptible to kidney stones than any other race of people. The depletion of bone mass is responsible for their low bone density. It is widely regarded that black people have the strongest bones of all people from infancy to old age.
Melanin has been proven to not only being beneficial to the human reproductive system and nervous system, but melanin also plays an important part in sight and hearing. Blue eyes are simply eyes that lack melanin. Blue eyes are more sensitive to sunlight and do not process light or produce sight as efficiently as brown eyes. Isn’t it funny how many people place divine qualities with blue eyes that are nothing but genetically defective?
Posted by Reader X (Part 5), on 11-16-2008 20:10,
Melanin is also said to be linked with hearing. Melanocytes are present in the inner ear, the eye, and in the membrane that covers the brain and spinal cord. It has been demonstrated that melanin deposits in these areas are proportional to the amount of melanin found in the skin. These areas of the body, similar to the skin, are exposed to high-energy free radicals that can damage the surrounding cells, and thus causes a lower threshold for hearing. Evidence shows that black people, on average, hear better than whites, and that within both races, women surpass men. A partial explanation of the differences may lie in the abundance in the inner ear of melanin pigments. Also, numerous studies have found that people with light eye colors, such as blue, green, and hazel are more vulnerable to hearing damage than are people with black or brown eyes.
The late renowned Anthropologist, Dr. Margaret Meade, in an experiment with indigenous Australians, Black Melanesian Islander children and white Anglo-Saxon children in the US, revealed that the “memory bank” of black children was greater and their “instant recall ability” from memory, outstanding. She, like most renowned researchers, concluded that black children have a deeper memory bank and hence higher IQ than their counterpart European and American Biochemists have attributed this great phenomenon to ‘neuro-melanin’ - a chemical responsible for black.
Posted by Reader X (Part 6), on 11-16-2008 20:14,
In his book, “The Chemical Key to Black Greatness” American Biochemist, Carol Barnes, described melanin as, “a civilizing chemical that acts as a sedative to help keep the black human calm, relaxed, caring, creative, energetic and civilized”. Research also revealed that melanin enables black skin to actively interact with the sun, to produce Vitamin D from a biochemical substance, 7- dehydrocholesterol. The study also detected that, melanin has spiritual dynamics as well as physical, since it acts as a sensory ‘receptor’ and ‘transmitter’; communicating with cosmic energy fields in the vast universe converting light energy to sound energy and back. Dr. Richard King, MD, stated that, “melanin, by its ability to capture light and hold it in a memory mode, reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge”.
With all of this information, we can plainly see that melanin is ESSENTIAL for the efficient performance of all of the body’s natural functions. It seems a little ironic, that white people deem themselves genetically superior with the oxymoron of white supremacy. There is nothing supreme about a genetic defect. White people are merely mutated inbred albinos. This alone adds credence to them being an inferior stock. To feel better about themselves they develop totally senseless propaganda to flatter them and to make they feel better about their genetic condition at the expense of people of color. The doll test, where it has been reported that both white kids and black kids prefer WHITE dolls is solely out of ignorance, that I have termed “centuries of BRAINWASHARY.” It has clearly been shown that white skin is actually indicative of albinism. Albinism is a genetic defect. Who in their right mind would prefer a genetically defective condition to one that is Nature’s normal and has been proven more efficient?
Posted by Reader X (Part 7a), on 11-16-2008 20:18,
This is why we need to continue our crusade to decolonize the minds of the original genetic template (black people) to see through the nonsense propagated by white people to flatter themselves. Total ignorance can be fought with knowledge. A more recent tactic white people use to appease themselves is the “Implicit Association Test.” They have devised a means to make it seem as though white people are supposed to be the most desirable people on the planet and that everyone wants to be like them and be around them. If you can see through the nonsense, then you will know what I mean. Would you want to be around a bunch of paranoid genetic defects with psychological problems and with intermittently inferior genes? In a nutshell, black people, being the original genetic template are the only fully NORMAL people on the planet. White people are albinos (recessive genetic defects) and other ethnicities are merely admixtures in between.
Always remember these points, and you should never have to hold your head down to any recessive genetic defects. All phenotypes exist within the black family. Asian people are only the semi-recessive descendants of their ancestors who were a black African tribe with slanted eyes. White people are the albinos of a specific group of Africans and have inherited those people’s phenotypes. They try to imply that their phenotypes were originally theirs and that if you see people of African descent with these features, they inherited them from white people. Nothing is further from the truth. Blacks are the genetic parents. Remember, whites cannot reproduce anything else but themselves. They cannot reproduce genetic material they don’t have, melanin. Therefore, they cannot reproduce us, but we can reproduce them and all others in humanity.
Posted by Reader X (Part 7b), on 11-16-2008 20:23,
This should also convince you that all of the great civilizations from antiquity had to be started by us. White people with their recessive genes and poor reproductive systems, could not have lasted that long, seemingly that they are disappearing faster than anything now. Breeding with us, or breeding without us.
Posted by Lonisse, on 11-17-2008 11:49,
Ooookaaayy..... ?!?!?!?!
Posted by Dr. Firpo CArr, on 11-17-2008 16:52,
Dear Reader X:
Thank you for your comments. While you have provided a great deal of detail, I surmise that you agree with my premise that the face of race is changing in America. If I have misinterpreted your comments, I'm sure you'll let me know.
Godspeed,
Dr. Firpo Carr
P.S. I may offer more observations later. Then again, maybe not...
