Written by Dr. Firpo W. Carr, (Columnist), on 08-14-2008 17:30
Favoured
18
Any Black-on-White officer-involved shootings?
When was the last time you heard outrage over the fact that a Black police officer, deputy sheriff, highway patrolman, or any other Black law-enforcement officer unjustifiably shot and killed a member of some White supremacist group (or any White person for that matter)? Yea, that’s what I thought. Calling attention to the rarity of such an event is not at all a subliminal suggestion that it should happen more often, if at all. But then comes the $64,000 question: Why does it rarely happen to them but happen so often to us? The answer is simple: racism. When law-enforcement agencies across the country accepted Blacks on the force, they were not allowed to arrest Whites. That restriction has evolved today into the de facto rule that says a Black officer better think twice before pulling the trigger on a White suspect. Take the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for example.
“The first black officer joined the LAPD in 1886,” says the Los Angeles Times of July 13, 1998, “17 years after the department became a paid police force. Thirty years later, the first black female officer joined the agency. The number of black officers grew in relation to the burgeoning black population, particularly around the turn of the century.” Then comes the quiet revelation. “In those days, they were restricted to working in the black communities, first in the area that is known today as the Central Division and later in the Newton Division.” Translation? They couldn’t arrest White people. It was part of what I call “Colored Cop Conundrum,” the marginalization of Black peace officers. If a White man was committing a crime the Black officer had to call for a White officer to intervene. “In those days,” the article continues, “the downtown areas were sometimes referred to at the LAPD as the ‘ghetto divisions.’...Blacks only were partnered with each other; if one partner did not show up for work, the other was sent home.” The unwritten rule now is: You can arrest Whites, but you can’t shoot them.
Whites, in or out of the LAPD, are considered more important than Blacks. Sgt. Ronnie Cato, President (and “Minster of Truth”) of the Oscar Joel Bryant Foundation, an organization of predominantly Black officers within the LAPD, wrote in the latest issue of OJB Magazine (Volume I, Issue II, June ‘08): “Over the year, the Oscar Joel Bryant Foundation (OJB) has been making the case that African American employees have been discriminated against because of institutional racism on the Los Angeles Police Department. We have cited a number of cases where Black employees have been denied promotions, pay-grade advancements, and job opportunities that would have placed them in a position to improve their skills and to promote. But because of the unpopularity and the taboo nature of the subject of racism, OJB has been a lonely voice on this subject.
“In fact, the LAPD has never admitted to the racial divide that has polarized this department. There have also been many employees (Whites and Blacks) who have taken issue with the organization’s position on race, some claiming that there is no evidence of racism on the department. But of course, when we interview the average Black employee and they talk about their experience and innermost feelings of the LAPD, it doesn’t take long before you hear the deep despair in their voices, and see the sense of surrender and hopelessness in their eyes.
“In talking to our members, mostly African American, we found that at every level and in virtually every division in this department, there are Black employees with their own stories and experiences of racial prejudice. We have also found that even those who would publicly deny being victims of racism are crying inside and welcome the opportunity to quietly and privately share their experiences, but for fear of reprisal they internalize these feeling[s] and go along to get along. Indeed, the Black experience on this department has been very different from the White experience, and the effects have been devastating both personally and professionally for some Blacks; so severe that many have simply given up, surrendered their rights, while others are just waiting for an opportunity to quit or retire.” Sgt. Cato assures me there’s much more to be said.
Another “Color Cop Conundrum” is that when SWAT Police Officer Randal “Randy” Simmons, the very personification of bravery and dedication, gave his life in the line of duty on Thursday, February 7, 2008, he die for an organization whose initials “S.W.A.T.” (Special Weapons and Tactics) could easily stand for “Start With African (American) Targets” since the internal LAPD organization was the brainchild of Officer John Nelson and then inspector but future police chief Daryl Gates in 1965, the year of what was then called the Watts’ Riot. Why was SWAT created? “To deal with threats from organized factions such as the Black Panther Party and other radical groups operating during that time,” says one source. The Klan had been around for 100 years, yet, no one came up with “Stopping White American Terrorists.” This takes nothing away Randy Simmons, a hero and role model in ways too numerous to list here. Nor does it diminish the collective effort and outstanding sacrifice of both sworn and civilian Black LAPD employees. Calling attention to the conundrum highlights the unique challenge these employees face on the job and at home where the tentacles of deep rooted job inspired racism penetrate.
Is this just the experience of African Americans? “A report [in 2006] from Scotland Yard, headquarters for London’s Metropolitan Police, on race and marijuana arrests is leading to charges of racism,” says one source. “The report found that people from an African or Caribbean background made up 40% of all marijuana arrests in London, despite making up only 12% of the population. To make matters worse, once someone was stopped by police for violating the marijuana laws, he was more likely to be arrested if he was black.” Sounds familiar? Like the LAPD, Scotland Yard denies that racism is a factor. And like Ronnie Cato, George Rhoden, chairman of the Yard’s Black Police Association asserts: “It has got to be about racism. These figures show that racism plays a significant part in the way police deal with people of color.”
Down in Winnfield, Louisiana (about 40 miles northwest of Jena), White police officer Scott Nugent murdered Baron Pikes, a 21-year-old Black man, by what I call “electronic lynching.” Nugent tortured a handcuffed Pikes to death by tasering him nine times with 50,000 volts. Who was it that said the stun-gun was non-lethal force? Inglewood police officer Brian Ragan shot and killed Kevin Wicks last month and Michael Byoune earlier this year, and has apparently been involved in several other police shooting according to attorneys representing the Wicks family. Among other things these facts provoke is a series of questions:
How often do White-on-Black officer-involved shootings occur? What about Black-on-White? White-on-White? Black-on-Black? Black-on-Latino? White-on-Latino? Latino-on-Black? Latino-on-Latino? Latino-on-White? Are such records kept? These and other questions will be entertained in one of my September articles wherein I’ll also make a major announcement regarding Black officers from across the country. Stay tuned. Amen.
Word for the Week (or is it “Weak”?): conundrum: “A kind of riddle based upon some fanciful or fantastic resemblance between things quite unlike; a puzzling question, of which the answer is or involves a pun.”
I was intrigued by your article, but not informed.
For the past few years I have been grappling with developing a model that personifies racism (if that can be done) giving it a definite face.
Using the Pythagorean Theorem, theories of probability, the specific and general theories of relativity, I was able to calculate mathematical 'improbabilities' that I refer to collectively as the 'non-random occurrence of events'. Most succinctly it can be described thusly – if you toss a coin ten times and get heads each time, what will you gamble on the next toss?
Looking at outcomes strictly, I am able to develop a model that can identify when racism is in effect as it refers to the disproportionate numbers of Afro Americans who are homeless, un(der)educated, un(der)employed.
Years ago I began working on models to develop an accelerated learning process for students in Los Angeles Unified School District at risk of failing the exit exam or dropping out of school (disproportionately Afro-American); mortality rate for Afro-American male youth 14-26; child support collected for Afro-American custodial parents or not; educational support for parenting among such youthful parents to address and overcome such issues.
Posted by MS Salaam, on 09-03-2008 16:05,
(cont'd from above)
By approaching issues in this manner, I worked to develop solutions such as the accelerated learning process; homeownership development; entrepreneurial support; business incubation to break the cycle of racism entrenching this segment of the citizen population in its clutches. I received not a single supporter. Meantime, homelessness has increased, businesses are now routinely shipped overseas; the number of businesses now being generated is much, much less than ever before; more Afro-Americans will lose their homes.
I thank you for the information you provide as it helps me in my resolve to continue to seek solutions that address the true nature of our societal structure and how broadly it affects our capacity to grow as a democratic people and move the implementation of democratic principles forward. Specifically I had asked myself why so few white folks died at the hands of Afro-American police. I look forward to reading more.
Thank you.
MS Salaam
Posted by Dr. Firpo Carr, on 09-03-2008 16:11,
Brother Salaam:
Although you may be intrigued but not informed, I am both intrigued and informed; and, I might add, impressed. After making your keen observations I notice that you propose some rather ambitious undertakings wherein you predicate future actions on a pattern of past events. However, based on your paradigm, this is an impossibility.
As per your coin toss example, no one in the history of mankind has been able to “break the cycle of racism.” Instead of complaining that it’s hot in the desert (which you are not by the way), I say we focus our energies (which, commendably, you are doing) on preparing for and enduring the heat for as long as we’re in the desert.
I am of the opinion that the democratic process isn’t the answer. When compared to communism it is, to be sure, the lesser of two evils. But the lesser of two evils is still “evil.”
The sad state of affairs that you’ve so eloquently outlined above is evidence that “democratic principles” as implemented by the government of the United States don’t work for its citizens of African descent. I give you Katrina as one of many examples.
Your optimism is admirable, if I may say so, but not well founded. And more to the point of our topic, Black police officers work within the confines of perhaps the most visible and racist element of the prodigious racist apparatus called the United States of America. Without a strong paramilitary arm to enforce racist ideologies, racism and discrimination would lack teeth. As it stands now, they both have a full set, with dentures as backup.
I hope and pray that you continue in your efforts to help our people deal with the oppressive heat of racism and discrimination and all the evils associated with it, my dear brother.
Your commnets are always welcome.
Dr. Firpo Carr
Posted by MS Salaam, on 09-04-2008 14:40,
Thank you for the response. I’m not a brother however.
In my effort to democratize the republic, I see the opportunity to progress democracy that results in a reduced role for republican states, a change that's real in a context that has remained static in the over 200 years since the country was established.
I say let all voting age citizens serve in all elective, appointive, political civil service positions. Put names in a hat and let them serve for two years collecting the same salary until the term is over. With 2/3 of the voting age citizen population or the representatives of that population we can make significant and long lasting changes that shape the democracy of the people and forever end the tyranny of republican statehood now guaranteed to the states in this union by the constitution.
It really is time for a change.
Thank you for your attention in this matter. Such enlightened conversation is always welcome.
Posted by Dr. Firpo Carr, on 09-04-2008 14:52,
What if the person randomly selected in what you propose is not qualified? As brutal as it may sound to some, there is such a thing as the “ignorance of the masses.” Insofar as republican states are concerned, indeed, “state’s rights” were responsible for the Klan, “citizen groups,” and other racist organizations that oppressed, suppressed, harassed, and killed Blacks down South. Your point is well taken.
As far as it really being a “time for a change” as you put it, I could not agree with you more. But again, to use your paradigm, the facts have shown for the past 6,000 years that every conceivable form of government has been tried by humankind, and all have failed miserably; not a one was a panacea for the ills and challenges facing the human race.
Again, in line with your train of thought, can you site examples where what you propose above have “democratized the republic”? To restate my point, in my review of past and present examples of human rule I have found that autocracies, plutocracies, democracies, communists, socialists, and totalitarian governments—to name a few--have all proved inadequate. The people suffered under them all. FAILURE is what these conflicting ideologies all have in common. Forgive me for being blunt, sir. It’s just the harsh reality of the matter.
Rest assured I am pleased to take the time to exchange ideas and explore possible remedies for what ails my brothers and sisters in the Diaspora, yea, all our relatives in the human family.
Posted by MS Salaam, on 09-04-2008 16:32,
I don't know if I’m just stupid or too unafraid or too afraid of what has already been.
Like I say we can change the paradigm of these republican democratic states with a two thirds vote of those who voted in the last election.
I know that's going to be hard.
But I can't do this alone.
I'm a sister.
Posted by Dr. Firpo Carr, on 09-04-2008 16:49,
Oh my sister, your beautiful mind has come up with some impressive ideas. You’re far from “stupid.” The frustration many have experienced and are experiencing is the culmination of thousands of years of humanity’s inability to govern itself. Furthermore, though many think so, nationalism isn’t the answer either.
Not only have governments killed countless civilians of their enemy’s population, certain governments have even murdered millions of their own citizens!
The plain truth of the matter is that we have to look in the right place--go to the right source--for real guidance. We're all “stupid” if we keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result. Now that's "stupid"! Imperfect humankind cannot govern itself, dear Salaam. This is a mere observation and acknowledgement of a cold hard fact.
If you’re interested in learning more of what I am convinced is the answer to the problems plaguing humanity, hit me back.