Opinion - Americas Number One Black News Source
Vol. LXXVIII, NO. 19
Thursday, May 10 - May 16, 2012
Voted America's Number One Black Newspaper
Main Menu
Front Page
News
Sports
Entertainment
Business
Family
Religion
Opinions
Columns
Beneath The Spin
Urban Perspective
Dr. Firpo Carr
Dr. Karenga
Noetic
The Bridge
Voices
Young Black and Female
Services
Customer Care
Home Delivery
Media Kit
ADVERTISEMENT


America's Number One African American News Source
May 17, 2012 at 12:01 AM
Front Page arrow Opinions arrow Op-Ed arrow Fox News doesn't care about Black people, does the Congressional Black Caucus?
Fox News doesn't care about Black people, does the Congressional Black Caucus?
Written by By James Rucker, on 03-29-2007 12:31
Favoured 144

What would you say if someone told you that Black members of Congress were planning to host a presidential debate with a TV network that likens Black churches to cults, implies that U.S. Senator Barack Obama is a terrorist, and used the solemn occasion of Coretta Scott King’s funeral to call Black leaders “racist?” You’d probably wonder, “Have these brothers and sisters lost their minds?”

The Congressional Black Caucus Political Education and Leadership Institute (CBCI) is on the verge of partnering with Fox News to host 2008 presidential debates. CBC members may not have lost their minds, but they’re about to lose their way.

Fox is clearly no friend to Black people. The network regularly uses its reach to denigrate all things Black— Black people, Black cultural institutions and Black leaders—while it stokes whites’ fears of losing race-based privilege in America. John Gibson, a Fox TV host, recently urged viewers to “Make more babies!” in a segment delivering the frightening news that half of American children under five are “minority.” Regular guest Mary Matalin used Corretta Scott King’s funeral as a chance to call civil rights leaders “nothing more than racists who are keeping their brothers and sisters enslaved.” Four times in the last month, Sean Hannity has invited Black guests to attack Sen. Barack Obama’s church as separatist, racist, and cultish. After Fox repeatedly harped on Obama’s middle name, Hussein, and ran a completely fabricated story that the Senator was schooled as an Islamic fundamentalist, the Senator announced that he would no longer speak with Fox reporters at all.

Since rumors about the Fox/CBCI deal were confirmed about a month ago, more than 12,000 of our members have emailed the CBCI, making the case against Fox and asking the Institute not to proceed with the deal. After getting no response, members made more than 600 phone calls to individual members of the CBC, asking that they speak publicly against this partnership.

Instead of hearing folks’ concerns, most offices gave callers the run-around, sending them to a CBCI voicemail box that was full for over a week, and saying the Fox debate is the Institute’s issue, not the CBC’s. It’s a ridiculous response. Everything the CBC Institute does is done with the tacit approval of the CBC. The Institute is led and supported by CBC members, and any CBC member can and should speak up if the Institute goes astray. Some representatives have said privately that they don’t agree with the deal, but not one has been willing to stand up to Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chair of the CBC Institute, and the person most intent on seeing this deal go forward. Thompson is a good man, but on this issue, he is absolutely wrong.

Hurricane Katrina showed us the importance of having strong leaders in Washington who can take moral leadership and hold their own colleagues accountable. If our leaders can’t take a stand when the political consequences for doing so are minor and the issues are relatively simple, what can we expect when there’s plenty of pressure and the issues are more complicated? And when Black leaders willfully ignore the voices of Black Americans and act in opposition to our interest, what signal does that send to non-Black members of Congress?

Members of the CBC might not realize it, but the CBC is going down a dangerous path. Having Black voices at the table during presidential debates is critical, but that’s not the issue. The CBCI already has a deal with CNN to host debates, another major news network has also expressed interest, and PBS is doing a series of debates along with Tavis Smiley at HBCUs. A partnership with Fox risks sullying the Caucus’ reputation as “the conscience of Congress” and an advocate for racial equality and justice. Worse, a CBC partnership with Fox does what our enemies can only dream of: it uses the most prominent Black brand in politics to validate and legitimize an organization that attacks us on a regular basis.

The CBC can still do the right thing here, but it’s going to take Black Americans sending a strong message. It’s up to us to let them know that we’re watching and that we expect better.

You can help—if your representative in Congress is Rep. Maxine Waters or Rep. Diane Watson, give them a call at 310-642-4610 or 323-965-1422 respectively, and ask that they publicly oppose the CBC Institute/Fox deal. Visit colorofchange.org online for more information and other ways to make a difference, and foxattacks.com to see a short video of Fox’s attacks on Black America.

(James Rucker is a co-founder and executive director of ColorOfChange.org, an online advocacy organization with more than seventy thousand members dedicated to amplifying the political voice of Black American. Visit www.colorofchange.org for more information.)


Last update: 09-18-2007 15:41

Published in : Op-Ed, Op-Ed
Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Related articles

Users' Comments (2) RSS feed comment
Posted by james Maddox, on 12-11-2007 11:57,
I susggest that you advise concerned individuals to send e-mails to their Congressional Representatives
 

Posted by seismedia, on 10-10-2009 17:22,
Hello, I'm not black, but I would think it wouldn't matter what color I am, right? I mean, the good fight of the civil rights movement was to get society to set aside color as a means to judge a man or woman. 
 
That being said, here's my point, if America has shown that she's color blind enough to elect a president of whatever color or background, is it time to cease the defensive posturing of the Black Caucus? We don't need a "White" Caucus, and in spite of the minority status, we don't have a "Chinese" Caucus or "Japanese" Caucus, so is it time to stop with the divisive politicking? 
 
If it isn't ready to dismantle, maybe the worst thing to ever happen to the Black Caucus was the election of a Black American President? Or is the goal of equality not yet met? 
 
Let me leave this for everyone in the Caucus and those that hail the Caucus as their leaders, are you satisfied with the ultimate equality of a Black President, or are you seeking for further retribution? If the fight was for equality, it was a good fight. If it becomes a quest to turn the tables, then greats like MLK are dishonored and it becomes a meritless fight.
 

Add your comment

ADVERTISEMENT
Young, Black, and Female
by Jasmyne A. Cannick, (Columnist)
Dr Firpo Carr
by Dr. Firpo W. Carr, (Columnist)
Urban Perspective
The Bridge
by Darryl James, (Columnist)
Noetic to The Third Power
by Alfonzo Tucker, (Columnist)
Dr. Maulana Karenga
by Dr. Maulana Karenga, (Columnist)
Rev Jesse Jackson
by Rev. Jesse Jackson, (Columnist)
Beneath The Spin
Privacy Policy | Terms Of Service | About | Contact | Advertise | Home Delivery
Copyright 2012 Los Angeles Sentinel