Opinion - Americas Number One Black News Source
Vol. LXXVI, NO. 35
Thursday, September 1 - 8, 2010
Voted America's Number One Black Newspaper
Main Menu
Front Page
News
Sports
Entertainment
Business
Family
Religion
Editorials
Opinions
Corrections
Columns
Beneath The Spin
Urban Perspective
Dr. Firpo Carr
Dr. Karenga
Noetic
The Bridge
Voices
Young Black and Female
Services
Customer Care
Home Delivery
Media Kit
ADVERTISEMENT

America's Number One African American News Source
Sep 03, 2010 at 04:22 AM
Front Page arrow Opinions arrow The Bridge arrow The Roots of Christmas & Jesus (Part 2)
The Roots of Christmas & Jesus (Part 2)
Written by Darryl James, (Columnist), on 12-10-2009 00:00
Favoured 46

The Roots of Christmas & Jesus
Part 2

Religion and/or spirituality are personal choices and lifestyles that should be unifying forces, not divisive elements.

I notice that whenever a person runs from divergent beliefs it is because they are not as grounded as they say they are. While I respect all religions, I find it disturbing that Christians, out of all religious people in America, can be the most closed-minded and judgmental.

As human beings of the same planet and of the same God (no matter what name you use for God, there is but one), we should seek to align ourselves with people who have good hearts and who do good work--not simply people who blindly follow things they do not fully understand. There should be no unification based on ignorance.

As a man of God, I am at once disgusted and saddened by the lunatics and overbearing heretics who claim to represent God and who claim to know Jesus (Yahshua, the Black revolutionary). As a scholar, I already know that they have more than likely never read the Bible for themselves or studied history and therefore, have no real clue as to the reality of Jesus of Nazareth.

It is my greatest wish that people who wish to represent Jesus would study to learn who he truly was.

Jesus was a Black revolutionary who believed in all faiths for all people. He was not a Christian, but a Hebrew. He also rejected the concept of himself as a messiah or more of a son of God than any of us.

Jesus also rejected the concept of Church because he knew that it would exclude some of the people he loved the most. The sad part is that people have come to use his name and misrepresent him while they do things he would never do--like judge others based on differences.

Jesus worshipped his father with people of all religions (there was no Christianity during Jesus' time) and walked with people of all walks of life. Yet, today, many ill-informed Christians claim to love him and desire to follow him, but turn ignorance toward differences.

If you really read the Bible, then you will know that Jesus was not trying to convince people to worship within any religion, and he certainly wasn't trying to push people to worship him. If you claim to aspire to be like Jesus, you should realize that you only do that when you are tolerant of other belief systems.

Knowledge of the Bible and of history will reveal that what Jesus was trying to deliver to other humans, more than anything else, was an understanding of conscious evolution, which means that he had mastered the power of critical thinking. What would Jesus do? Well, he wouldn't be hating people because they hold divergent faiths. Believe that.

In organizations such as the Green Beret, the slogan goes, "Many are called but few are chosen." Such is also the case with universal conscious evolution.

Jesus states in Matthew 7:14: "Strait is the gate and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."

Jesus is saying that "narrow is the way," and "few there be that find it," which means that the true path will not be followed by the majority. In other words, whatever is popular, is more than likely NOT the correct path. Also, by saying "few there be that find it," Jesus is illustrating that the path is not a mass pursuit, but that each individual should determine for self the way which "leadeth unto life."

As A HEBREW HIMSELF, Jesus advocated for intrinsic spiritual enlightenment and conscious evolution, not blind and exclusionary participation in any one religion. Also, like many other prophets and revolutionaries, Jesus was not very popular during his time, and neither were his doctrines.

Remember, Jesus was not a Christian, and promoted only love for humanity and for his father, God, not for any religion. Christianity was manufactured following his murder at the hands of crazed religious zealots, who curiously, were promoting THEIR religious beliefs when they killed him.

Please allow me to quote three immortal thinkers:

According to Mark Twain, "If Christ were here there is one thing he would not be...a Christian."

"There are people in the world so hungry, that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread," said Mahatma Ghandi.

And, finally, from the new school of conscious evolution and critical thinking, Darryl James preaches that "There are perhaps more atheists created from the unwitting repulsion generated by religious zealots than the careful work of the devil himself."

The conscious evolution promoted by Jesus, Mohammed and other historical visionaries allows humans to transcend the clannishness of religions in order to focus on the universal love found in the true Kingdom of God. There is no evolution in promoting one religion over another. If all paths lead to God, then your path is as valid as my own, unless of course, you have spoken directly to God--in which case, you are either delusional, a prophet, or full of crap.

Religion, faith and spirituality are individual pursuits that are very elusive in their purity. There is no evolution in pushing the same vapid thoughts to the masses without critical thinking and a historical perspective.

Take that into consideration the next time you send out your insipid Jesus emails or otherwise deliver such messages unwarranted without a care in the world for your brethren who did not ask for them. How mean spirited and witless is it to continue to flood the masses with information that you yourself more than likely don't really understand?

Those truly serious and dedicated Christians who have read the Bible know that Jesus never advocated the celebration of his birth. His message was to remember what his death represented. In that same Bible, such celebrations as Christmas have been tktk as heathen activities.

That having been said, the current season of Christmas has become more about love and togetherness than anything, which is why it is held by a number of people of all faiths.

This Christmas season, spread love, spread holiday cheer and spread the spirit of giving and sharing, which does not mean jamming your religion down the throats of the masses.

Quite frankly, in doing so, you are moving away from the conscious evolution pursued by Jesus of Nazareth, and are therefore, DANCING WITH THE DEVIL. Nevertheless, our God has given you the freedom to do so, just as Hitler, the slave masters, and the warmongering leaders of this nation were allowed to make their own choices on God's green earth.

Just don't lie and claim to do it in the name of Jesus.

Happy Holidays!

Last update: 12-10-2009 00:00

Published in : Op-Ed, The Bridge
Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Related articles

Users' Comments (8) RSS feed comment
Posted by ComeOnNow, on 01-05-2010 11:26,
Good article but come on now. Jesus was not a black man. Nor was he white (the most common misconception). He was brown, just like most people in the Middle East these days.
 

Posted by darryl james, on 01-07-2010 09:07,
ComeOnNow, you sound silly. It's been proven by a variety of sources that people in the land during that time period werenot just Brown, But very dark skinned as the rest of Africa was. We're not talking about today, because the people there now are just like Americans.
 

Posted by ComeOnNow, on 01-07-2010 10:07,
Silly? Really? All credible sources (credible being the key word here) say otherwise. And that's ok. It doesn't matter what skin color he had. Well, I guess it matters to you for some, well, silly reason but anyone who gets it knows it doesn't make a difference.
 

Posted by Kerry, on 01-07-2010 23:40,
This has to be the most dishonest piece of journalism that I have ever read. Do you always insult those who don't agree with your point of view? 
 
You say most Christians don't read and study their Bibles, which is sadly true. Let's take a look at what the Bible truly says. I agree with you as most Christians will, that we should be tolerant of people of other faiths, and not hate them. Being tolerant doesn't mean that we agree with different faiths, it means that we aknowledge the right of people to worship any way they please. 
 
Your reference to Matthew 7:14 is saying that narrow is the way, because only few will find that narrow way, which is faith in Him, Jesus. Read John 14:6 Jesus says "I am the and the truth and the life. No one come to the Father except through me. This sounds and is exclusive, this is the narrow gate that Matthew 7:14 talks about.I you read verse 21 of that same chapter, Jesus is telling people to depart form him into the lake of fire, because He (Jesus) doesn't know them. This is exclusitivity, you must know Jesus to be saved. It is clear to me that you haven't read the Bible or don't understand what it says. Jesus most definitely says that he is God. Read John 10:30 where Jesus says, "I and the Father are one". If Jesus and the Father (God) are one, doesn't this make Jesus God? Yes! You can also read the book of Hebrews, especially chapter 1. And before you say Jesus didn't write the book of Hebrews, remember that Jesus didn't any of the Bible personally and that the entire Bible, all 66 books are inspired or God breathed by God. See 2 Timothy 3:15-17. Read it carefully, you'll once again see that alvation is exclusively through Jesus. 
 
Darryl, you have every right to your own beliefs and I personally respect that. Keep in mind that others have a righjt to their beliefs as well. Also keep in mind that the Jesus of the Bible claimed to be God, proved it through His resurretion and said that salvation is through Him alone, Acts 4:12.
 

Posted by D, on 01-10-2010 11:22,
And that's ok. It doesn't matter what skin color he had. Well, I guess it matters to you for some, well, silly reason but anyone who gets it knows it doesn't make a difference.  
 
----I submit to you if his color doesn't matter, WHY did 'they' change it to white?
 

Posted by ComeOnNow, on 01-11-2010 06:29,
I suppose for the same reason that the author changed it to black. To fit their own misleading view. Two wrongs don't make a right!
 

Posted by Early Times, on 01-11-2010 11:48,
Mr. James, you have, along with many other alert observers of biblical history, set in motion an interesting insight into ethnicity of biblical personages, 
 
My research has unearthed still another debate. It's about Moses' wife, Zipporah. Of her, historians now have this to say: " A third reference to a wife of Moses occurs in the story of Aaron and Miriam's complaints, at Numbers 12:1, where his wife is described as a Cushite or Kushite, an African ethnic group. However the Midianites themselves were a dark-skinned people often called Kushim, the Hebrew word used to describe dark skinned Africans. Modern biblical criticism has posited that Zipporah and this Cushite wife were different individuals[citation needed], particularly since bigamy was legal, and practiced by Jacob, a major patriarch.[1] Traditional Jewish sources debated throughout Mishnaic and Medieval times, whether Zipporah was indead (sic) the Cushite woman. What has become known as "the Cushite reference" identifies Zipporah with the ancient inhabitants of North Sudan, i.e. the ancient Cushites (also known as Nubians- a dark skinned, African people). 
 
And this is only for starters. Other scholars boldly state that the Cushites were a "black skinned ethnic group of North Africa." The point is that many are beginning to take note of the ethnicities of early biblical characters. So keep up with your work, Mr. James, since nowhere in your capable exposition have I ever found an author who is "talking out of his head." On the contrary, you seem to be in excellent scholarly company!
 

Posted by Early Times, on 01-11-2010 11:56,
Unfortunately, the final quote closing out the third paragraph is missing. The quote is from Wiki. My apologies and thank you.
 

Add your comment

ADVERTISEMENT
Young, Black, and Female
by Jasmyne A. Cannick, (Columnist)
Dr Firpo Carr
by Dr. Firpo W. Carr, (Columnist)
Urban Perspective
The Bridge
by Darryl James, (Columnist)
Noetic to The Third Power
by Alfonzo Tucker, (Columnist)
Dr. Maulana Karenga
A Rightful and Dangerous Expectation
by Dr. Maulana Karenga, (Columnist)
Rev Jesse Jackson
by Rev. Jesse Jackson, (Columnist)
Beneath The Spin
Privacy Policy | Terms Of Service | About | Contact | Advertise | Home Delivery
Copyright 2010 Los Angeles Sentinel